Political repression has always been accompanied by migration. The two are inextricably tied together, and understandably there is always an economic dimension as well. Political groups that are banned or outlawed are cut off from institutional support, and thus, are forced to scramble In circumstances that are already quite difficult. I am thinking, of course, of cases such as North Korea, which is once again in the news with threats directed against its neighbors to the south and east, and to Cuba.
Migration
from Cuba has been an ongoing response not only to economic uncertainty but
also to political repression. Cuba has been undergoing what would seem to be a
long-overdue transformation, and there has supposedly been an opening up of the
economy. Market reforms are being introduced, and while this has the potential
of being destabilizing, it might in the long run insure the survival of the
current political regime.
North Korea
is another matter. The news stories seem always to highlight the results of
repression and mismanagement, and there were stories recently of supposed cases
of cannibalism in the face of a renewed, hidden famine. The new leader, Kim
Jung Il, seems ready to follow the lines of his father, and to engage in
exercises in bellicosity while maintaining a secretive power structure and a
closed society. Were those borders to open up, one wonders how many millions
might pour out of North Korea. It is a prospect that supposedly alarms China,
their one last ally.
Recently I
had a chance to see the 2005 film “Viva Cuba”. The dynamics of migration are
featured in this film, but in an underhanded way. One of the positive reviews
highlights that this work supposedly “depoliticizes” the phenomenon of
migration, but it certainly doesn’t lend any more clarity to the issue.
The film
details the exploits of two children, Jorgito and Malú, who are about to be
separated. It seems that Malú’s mother has married a foreigner in a bid to
escape the island, and that she now has the perfect opportunity to enact this
plan when her mother dies. One wonders at the dynamics of families that are, as
ever, on the verge of separation, with adults who seem unable to get along.
The
contrasts between the families are drawn in broad strokes. Jorgito’s family are
stalwarts of the revolution, with photos of the revered leader, Fidel, in their
house. Malú’s mom, on the contrary, seems to despise the revolution, and
considers herself to be part of the hidden and aspiring middle classes. This
leads to comical contrasts, but ones which are, as ever, too broad and easy to
be really enjoyable. A little more subtlety would have been appreciated.
It seems as
if the children have grown attached to each other, and they represent the two
halves of Cuban society, waiting for what should be a natural reconciliation.
The kids don’t want to be separated, as would happen if Malú’s mother succeeds
in her plan to leave the island and take her daughter. And so, they embark on a
quest to find the girl’s father, inform him of the situation, and hopefully
prevent this separation.
The journey
is filled with mishaps, but also, with adventure and magic. I appreciated the
views of this Cuban landscape that seems almost too idealized. I say this
because it almost seems like a middle-class vision, with little exploration of
the restrictions and hardships involved in having to deal with a faltering
economy that is being refashioned. Now, this is not to say that the children
don’t experience hunger, or that they don’t fall sick, or that they don’t
experience fear. They do, in episodes that recapitulate fairy tales, such as
Hansel and Gretel (in their encounter with a blind woman in the forest who puts
food out on the window sill, then hopes to imprison them) or the Little Red
Riding Hood singing episode, but this is very much a children’s point of view. We
don’t see the shortages and the grinding poverty that afflicts so many adults,
the need to scrape while also trying to preserve a little bit of dignity.
This film
seems like a wild caper that is very innocent, and in that way, deflects
consideration from the true dynamics and consequences of migration. The
children are, supposedly, meant to be together, and their loyalty to each other
is touching, but this is ultimately an exercise in escapism that fundamentally
tries to present an idealized Cuban landscape. Even the old icons are
reaffirmed, as in the sequence at the end where the children encounter a
bearded young man in the forest, one who takes them in and helps in their “subversive”
plan to evade detection by the authorities so that they can reach Malu’s father
who lives in a lighthouse on the other end of the island. The young bearded man
furthermore rides a bicycle, and the comparison is inevitable to the film “The
Motorcycle Diary” which details the voyage of Che Guevara as a young man
through South America before he joined the Cuban revolution.
Perhaps we
could all use a little more escapism. This film is certainly a far cry from the
films of Tomás Gutiérrez Alea that were released in the 60s, films such as “Memorias
del subdesarrollo” that were such seminal works in dealing with the
psychological and social impact of revolution. Those films were instant
classics, and they linger in my mind and memory as testaments to the Latin
American condition, if it could be said that there is such a thing. They
capture transformation and desire, but also, despair and anxiety.
Now we have
films that present innocent capers by children in the form of modern day fairy
tales, dressed up in modern clothing. This one also addresses a crumbling
society, but there is no excitement that is implicit in the idea of a grand
revolutionary project. It is, instead, perhaps a nostalgic view, and nostalgia
also is an exercise in idealism. It creates its subject, because memory is also
creation anew. We will never recapture the past as it was, because our vantage
points have changed, as have our needs.
The film,
this, is a little unfulfilling for me. The ending is meant to be somewhat
poetic, and I won’t describe it here, but is also strikes me as enigmatic,
because it leaves the two children as abandoned as they ever were. Their
viewpoint is, as ever, limited and characterized by excessive sentimentality.
And the acting seems at times too over-the-top. But the film does provide a
view of how a modern day Cuban director has left behind the legacy of Alea to
produce what are hopefully more commercially-accessible films. I’m just not
sure that this approach will be any more successful in bridging the divisions
that characterize Cuban society.
Viva Cuba is a 2005 Cuban film, directed by Juan Carlos Cremata and Iraida
Malberti Cabrera, and written by Cremata and Manolito Rodriguez
Eternal Observer -- ORomero (c) 2013
Copyrights ORomero 2013
Eternal Observer -- ORomero (c) 2013
Copyrights ORomero 2013